schaferwhat‽ wrote:ok to clarify, how does having multiple personalised expressions of acknowledgement to forumites birthdays undermine the civil atmosphere?
Just out of curiosity mind.
J D Dunsany wrote:The mods took the view that that approach wasn't enough, xisor.
schaferwhat‽ wrote:Edit: Tried to post this last night but my internet was being screwy.Ghurlag wrote:They, uh, are available. Up there.
...*Points*
That's all of it.
I'll chase up the moderation issue for you, though, shafe.
then what is this run through of the rules the mods will give me if I ask about joining?
schaferwhat‽ wrote:I'm out btw, it seems like an awful lot of effort just to discuss things on the internet. If I want to discuss things and sound out this community (and it happens, it's a nice, smart bunch here) I'm going to the traditional thing and post it for everyone and people can respond and react (either by taking part or taking offense) as they see fit.
schaferwhat‽ wrote:Where the line is drawn over if a subject is suitable for anyone or just for the chosen few who opt in to a discussions sub forum is unclear to me anyways and again the term "lighter moderation" with regards the new area means nothing when the current state of affairs isn't defined or organised.
Raziel4707 wrote:Perhaps we will have to consider this minor restriction as the price which we must pay for the benefits we receive, such as the interraction we enjoy with the editors and writers, which not many other places can boast, and the exclusive extracts and extra submission time that we've been offered. All gratis, all for being the forum that we are.
the moderators and the users engaging in a relationship built upon mature understanding and respect
flick wrote:I'm liking the debate about debating.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests